Customer Experience 65+ statistics

Customer Effort Score (CES) Statistics 2026: 65+ Data Points Every CX Leader Must Know

The definitive collection of Customer Effort Score statistics for 2026. Discover the latest CES benchmarks, ROI data, and research-backed insights on how reducing customer effort drives loyalty and revenue.

Published
Last Updated
Author Dr. Emily Chen Director of CX Research

Customer Effort Score (CES) has emerged as one of the most powerful predictors of customer loyalty. Unlike satisfaction metrics that measure how customers feel, CES measures what actually drives behavior—how easy it is to do business with you.

This comprehensive statistics page compiles 65+ impactful CES data points from Gartner, Forrester, McKinsey, and leading CX research firms. Every statistic is sourced, citable, and designed to help you build the business case for effort reduction.

Key Takeaways

96% of high-effort customers become disloyal

— Gartner "Effortless Experience" Research

94% repurchase intent with low-effort experiences

— Gartner Research

37% lower costs for low-effort interactions

— Gartner

2x more predictive of loyalty than NPS

— Gartner Research


CES and Customer Loyalty

The foundational research from Gartner’s “Effortless Experience” study of 97,000 customers established effort as the primary driver of loyalty and disloyalty.

Loyalty Impact — Gartner 97,000 Customer Study
96% of customers with high-effort service interactions become more disloyal
Source: Gartner "Effortless Experience" Research
96%
Only 9% of customers with low-effort experiences become disloyal
Source: Gartner "Effortless Experience" Research
9%
Customer service interactions are 4x more likely to drive disloyalty than loyalty
Source: The Effortless Experience (CEB, 97,000 customer study)
4x

96% of customers with high-effort service interactions become more disloyal, compared to only 9% with low-effort experiences.

— Gartner "Effortless Experience" Research

94% of customers with low-effort experiences intend to repurchase, compared to only 4% experiencing high effort.

— Gartner Research

88% of low-effort customers say they would increase their spending with the company.

— Harvard Business Review

View all loyalty statistics (3 more)
StatisticSource
Customer service interactions are 4x more likely to drive disloyalty than loyaltyCEB (97,000 customer study)
Customer effort is 40% more accurate at predicting customer loyalty than satisfaction scoresGartner
Increasing CES from 1 to 5 creates a 22% increase in customer loyaltyCEB Original Study

CES Predictive Power vs. Other Metrics

Understanding how CES compares to other experience metrics is crucial for deciding where to focus measurement efforts.

Loyalty Prediction Accuracy Comparison
CES (Customer Effort Score) 2.0x
CSAT (Customer Satisfaction) 1.1x
NPS (Net Promoter Score) 1.0x
CES is 1.8-2x more predictive of loyalty than CSAT and NPS
Source: Gartner Research

CES is 1.8x more predictive of customer loyalty than CSAT and 2x more predictive than NPS.

— Zonka Feedback / Gartner Research

NPS is 65 points higher for low-effort companies than for high-effort companies.

— Gartner

Customer effort is 40% more accurate at predicting customer loyalty than customer satisfaction scores.

— Gartner

View all metric comparison statistics (3 more)
StatisticSource
Satisfaction with the entire customer journey is 32% more predictive of loyalty than satisfaction with a single touchpointMcKinsey
For every 10-percentage-point increase in customer satisfaction, companies can achieve 2-3% higher revenueMcKinsey
Increasing CES from 1 to 5 creates a 22% increase in customer loyaltyCEB Original Study

Cost and ROI of Effort Reduction

Reducing customer effort doesn’t just improve experience—it directly reduces operational costs and drives revenue growth.

$
Cost Savings
37%
Lower cost for low-effort interactions vs. high-effort interactions
Source: Gartner
Repeat Calls
40%
Reduction in repeat calls when customer effort is minimized
Source: Gartner
Escalations
50%
Fewer escalations when low-effort experiences are delivered
Source: Gartner

Low-effort interactions cost 37% less than high-effort interactions.

— Gartner

A midsize call center saves an average of $286,000 annually with just a 1% improvement in first contact resolution.

— SQM Group

Online retailers face $22 million in average unnecessary costs due to channel escalation from high-effort interactions.

— Forrester

View all cost & ROI statistics (5 more)
StatisticSource
40% reduction in repeat calls when customer effort is minimizedGartner
50% fewer escalations when low-effort experiences are deliveredGartner
Customers spend 42% less time resolving issues when effort is reducedSobot
$28,000/month savings by improving FCR from 50% to 75% in a 4,000 call/month environmentGiva
$6,000-$20,000 cost to replace a single call center agentNextiva

Channel Switching and Omnichannel Statistics

Channel transitions represent one of the biggest sources of customer effort—and one of the most fixable.

62%
of customer service channel transitions are "high-effort"
Source: Gartner, 2023
54%
less channel switching with low effort
73%
use multiple channels per journey
80%
switched brands due to poor CX

62% of customer service channel transitions are classified as "high-effort" by customers.

— Gartner, 2023

Low-effort experiences result in 54% less channel switching compared to high-effort experiences.

— Gartner

An average of 4 minutes of costly rep time is saved per customer journey with seamless channel transitions.

— Gartner

View all channel switching statistics (4 more)
StatisticSource
73% of customers use multiple channels during their service journeyCX Today
80% of consumers have switched brands due to poor customer experienceQualtrics
74% of customers who experience easy transitions will return to self-service next timeCX Today
31% faster first resolution for companies with integrated omnichannel solutionsPlivo

Word-of-Mouth and Referral Impact

High-effort experiences don’t just lose customers—they spread negative word-of-mouth that damages your brand at scale.

High Effort Customers
81%
share negative feedback
Dissatisfied customers tell 9-15 people about their negative experiences
Low Effort Customers
1%
share negative feedback
72% of satisfied customers share positive experiences with 6+ people
It takes 40 positive experiences to undo the damage of 1 negative review
Sources: Zonka Feedback, WebFX

81% of high-effort customers share negative feedback about their experience, compared to only 1% of low-effort customers.

— Zonka Feedback

Dissatisfied customers tell 9-15 people about their negative experiences on average.

— ReferralCandy

It takes 40 positive customer experiences to undo the damage of a single negative review.

— WebFX

View all word-of-mouth statistics (4 more)
StatisticSource
45% of global customers tell family or friends about negative brand experiencesDigital Silk
91% of unhappy customers will leave without complaining—they just churn silentlyHelp Scout
33% of U.S. consumers consider switching companies after just a single poor service instanceNextiva
U.S. companies lose an estimated $75 billion annually due to poor customer serviceQualtrics

First Contact Resolution Statistics

First Contact Resolution (FCR) is directly correlated with customer effort—when issues resolve on the first contact, effort drops dramatically.

Customer Satisfaction by Number of Contacts Required
100%
1st Contact
84%
2nd Contact
68%
3rd Contact
52%
4th Contact
36%
5th+ Contact
Customer satisfaction drops ~16% with each additional contact required
Source: Qualtrics, SQM Group

30% of calls are repeat/callback calls due to first contact resolution failure.

— SQM Group

40% of customers defect to another company when first contact resolution doesn't occur.

— SQM Group

80% of service professionals now track FCR as a key metric, up from 51% in 2018.

— Salesforce

View all FCR statistics (2 more)
StatisticSource
15% satisfaction drop for each callback a customer must make to a call centerSQM Group
39% decrease in customer wait times with omnichannel integrationPlivo

Self-Service and Proactive Support Statistics

Self-service represents a major opportunity to reduce effort—when done right. Customers overwhelmingly prefer finding answers themselves.

14%
of customer service issues fully resolved in self-service
Source: Gartner, 2024
40-60%
query deflection with well-designed self-service portals
Source: Document360
92%
of consumers would use knowledge base for self-support if available
Source: Pylon
78%
of customers expect brands to offer online self-service portal
Source: Document360
81% of customers attempt to resolve issues themselves before contacting support
Source: Document360

Only 14% of customer service issues are fully resolved through self-service channels.

— Gartner, 2024

81% of customers attempt to resolve issues themselves before contacting support.

— Document360

Proactive customer service can deliver a 25% reduction in incoming call volume.

— NICE

View all self-service & proactive support statistics (4 more)
StatisticSource
92% of consumers would use a knowledge base for self-support if availablePylon
40-60% query deflection with well-designed self-service portalsDocument360
67% of customer churn can be prevented through proactive issue resolutionSparrowDesk
$5 million churn reduction opportunity identified by TELUS through proactive customer recoveryInMoment

CES Benchmarks by Industry

Industry benchmarks help contextualize your CES performance against peers and identify where your organization stands.

Average CES Scores by Industry (5-Point Scale)
Banking
4.4
Retail
4.3
Healthcare
4.2
Insurance
3.9
Telecom
3.6
Sources: CEB, Gartner, Temkin Group, Advisory Board Company

Gartner CES Benchmark: Scores below 70% indicate areas for improvement; above 90% indicates strong performance.

— Gartner

eCommerce leaders achieve CES scores of 5.8+ on a 7-point scale.

— Opensend

View all benchmark statistics (3 more)
StatisticSource
FCR benchmarks: Retail leads at 78%, Healthcare at 72%, Tech Support at 65%, Telecom at 61%SQM Group
Banking leads CES scores at 4.4/5.0 on a 5-point scaleCEB / Temkin Group
Telecom industry trails at 3.6/5.0 average CES scoreCEB / Advisory Board

Employee Experience Connection

The link between employee experience and customer effort is well-documented—employees who are empowered and engaged deliver lower-effort experiences.

The EX-CX Connection
Employee Experience Drives Customer Effort
83.4%
of CX leaders agree EX has quantifiable impact on CX
Source: CX Network
17%
increase in employee retention when reps deliver low-effort experiences
Source: Gartner
30-45%
Annual contact center turnover
$6K-$20K
Cost to replace one agent
63%
More sick days from burnout

83.4% of CX leaders agree that employee experience has a quantifiable impact on customer experience.

— CX Network

Employee retention increases by 17% when service reps consistently deliver low-effort customer experiences.

— Gartner

Contact centers experience 30-45% annual turnover, with each agent replacement costing $6,000-$20,000.

— Nextiva


Cost Per Contact Benchmarks

Understanding cost per contact helps quantify the ROI of effort reduction across different support channels.

Cost Per Contact by Channel
Human Phone Support
Traditional call center
$6.00
Industry Average Range
Varies by complexity
$2-$15
Chatbot Interaction
AI-powered self-service
$0.50
12x cost difference between human and chatbot interactions
Sources: LiveChatAI, Klipfolio, Teneo

Human phone support costs an average of $6.00 per contact, while chatbot interactions cost just $0.50—a 12x difference.

— LiveChatAI, Klipfolio

Industry average cost per contact ranges from $2 to $15, depending on complexity and channel.

— Teneo


How to Use These Statistics

These CES statistics can support your business case for effort reduction initiatives:

For Executive Presentations: Lead with the 96% disloyalty statistic and the 37% cost reduction figure to establish both the risk of inaction and the financial opportunity.

For Budget Requests: Use the $286,000 annual savings and specific ROI figures to demonstrate return on investment. Click the “Copy” button on any statistic to copy the full citation including source.

For Team Training: Share the predictive power comparison (CES vs. CSAT vs. NPS) to help teams understand why effort matters more than satisfaction.

For Benchmarking: Use industry-specific benchmarks to contextualize your current performance and set improvement targets.


Methodology & Sources

This statistics compilation draws from leading research organizations, consulting firms, and industry reports including:

  • Gartner - Effortless Experience research and CES best practices
  • Harvard Business Review - Stop Trying to Delight Your Customers
  • The Effortless Experience (CEB) - 97,000 customer study
  • McKinsey & Company - Customer experience and loyalty research
  • Forrester Research - CX Index rankings and channel research
  • SQM Group - First call resolution research
  • Zonka Feedback - CES methodology and benchmarks
  • Qualtrics - Customer effort score guides

All statistics are verified against original sources and updated quarterly to ensure accuracy and relevance.


Ready to Transform Your Experience Program?

See how ActionXM can help you capture, analyze, and act on feedback at scale.